Skip to content

STEM Students Boycott Google and Amazon Over Project Nimbus

Over 1,100 STEM students boycott Google & Amazon jobs over Project Nimbus, demanding ethical tech practices. Read more below.

Photo by Pawel Czerwinski / Unsplash

In a remarkable stand against corporate involvement in international conflicts, over 1,100 STEM students and young workers from more than 120 universities have pledged to boycott employment at tech giants Google and Amazon. This collective action comes in response to the companies’ participation in Project Nimbus, a controversial $1.2 billion contract to provide cloud services to the Israeli government.

A Unified Stand for Ethics

The pledge has united students across prestigious institutions, including Stanford, UC Berkeley, the University of San Francisco, and San Francisco State University. These students have joined forces with tech workers and activists in a vocal protest against Project Nimbus, culminating in a rally outside Google’s San Francisco office.

Google and Amazon are traditionally sought-after employers for STEM graduates, but this pledge signals a shift in priorities for the next generation of tech professionals. They are choosing to place ethical considerations over lucrative job offers, challenging the status quo of Silicon Valley’s employment landscape.

The Movement’s Momentum

No Tech for Apartheid (NOTA), a coalition spearheaded by MPower Change and Jewish Voice for Peace, has been instrumental in organizing this movement. Since 2021, NOTA has been advocating for a boycott of Project Nimbus due to its potential role in enhancing Israeli surveillance capabilities and contributing to the oppression of Palestinians.

The pledge highlights concerns that by providing advanced technology to the Israeli government, Google and Amazon are inadvertently facilitating a more efficient and violent form of apartheid against Palestinians.

Personal Convictions vs. Professional Opportunities

The movement has resonated with individuals like Sam, a recent Cornell University graduate, who expressed concern over the moral dissonance between private beliefs and professional choices. Naomi Hardy-Njie from the University of San Francisco also echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need for change to originate from grassroots levels.

NOTA’s efforts have not been without consequence; several Google workers have faced termination following protests organized by the coalition. Despite these setbacks, NOTA remains committed to its cause, with actions targeting Project Nimbus continuing to gain traction.

Corporate Response and Future Implications

Google maintains that Project Nimbus does not involve classified or military work, yet leaked documents suggest otherwise. The growing resistance from students and workers poses significant questions about the ethical responsibilities of tech companies in global politics.

As this movement gains momentum, it forces a reevaluation of the relationship between technology and ethics. The decisions made by these students today may very well shape the corporate policies of tomorrow.