Skip to content

BYJU’S Battles Lenders Over Contested $1.2Bn Loan Default Allegations

BYJU'S accuses its $1.2Bn TLB lenders of fabricating default claims amidst ongoing court disputes. The edtech titan aims to resolve matters, even as controversies and missed deadlines mount.

Edtech Behemoth's Courtroom Showdown

In a recent turn of events at the state court in Delaware, leading edtech platform BYJU’S has leveled accusations against its $1.2 billion Term Loan B (TLB) lenders, alleging that they devised false default claims in a strategic move to take control of the education technology giant, according to Bloomberg (1) .

Lenders' Strategy in Spotlight

Sheron Korpus, representing BYJU’S in court, asserted that the lenders, including significant U.S. investment entities like Redwood Investments LLC and Silver Point Capital LP, have been unduly aggressive, pressing for undue leverage in loan restructuring negotiations. He labeled their approach as demanding extortionate terms from BYJU’S.

Yet, despite this ongoing conflict, the edtech company remains committed to finding a common ground and arriving at a resolution.

Lenders Push Back

Brock Czeschin, speaking on behalf of the lenders, firmly denied the claims of opportunistic behavior. He countered, stating that BYJU’S has consistently failed to adhere to the loan agreement's stipulations, even going as far as admitting to those breaches.

This legal wrangle, spanning courts in Delaware and New York, adds another layer of complexity for BYJU’S. The company is under pressure to placate creditors and iron out the creases in its $1.2 billion loan deal— a loan that has been enveloped in a cloud of controversy since the previous year. What started as disagreements has now spiraled into lawsuits from both ends.

This legal uncertainty and subsequent delays in financial disclosures have spurred some of BYJU’S investors, including Prosus and Peak XV Partners, to adjust down their investments.

Originally, the steering committee of the lenders, which holds a dominant 85% of BYJU’S Term Loan B, had collectively agreed to an August 3 deadline to finalize an amendment. This amendment would have put a halt to the U.S. legal battles. However, both sides failed to meet this target date.

BYJU’S communicated on August 4 that while negotiations seem promising, the August 3 deadline was overly ambitious. The company anticipates another discussion with the committee in the forthcoming week.

Moreover, whispers have emerged about BYJU’S being entangled in a disagreement with Davidson Kempner over a $250 million debt fund acquired in May. It's rumored that Davidson Kempner has instigated changes in the Aakash board by introducing two independent directors, though both entities remain silent on the developments.